Femme Fatalities Message Board

I dunno. Talking about the things we find positive to each our tastes is a nice exercise, but listing negativities seems counter to our inclusive community. Or, we should at least let the ladies put up an equivalent list for men. :-)

JohnM

JohnM wrote:I dunno. Talking about the things we find positive to each our tastes is a nice exercise, but listing negativities seems counter to our inclusive community. Or, we should at least let the ladies put up an equivalent list for men. :-)

JohnM

Hi John,

I told you it was politically incorrect and brash. No, I didn't mean to offend anyone, especially the ladies amongst us, but we know that in our heads we all do it. Men classify women by looks. Women classify men by looks. These classifications are limited to our sexual fantasies though. I'm certainly not judging women as persons separate from their attractiveness as sexual objects. The above grading list is meant for superficial, sexual attraction purposes only. A woman's looks have absolutely nothing to do with their value as a person. In fact, I am well aware that many beautiful women are bitches and brainless and not very nice people at all, but this is fantasy plain and simple, and that is the caveat that applies to the above list.

To use an analogy, which everyone here should understand... There are hundreds of posts here about wanting to kill beautiful women, but that does NOT mean that we apply those thoughts to real life. So, in the same way, I do not apply my classification list to my real life relationships with real women. When I fantasize about women though, I'd be a shameless liar if I said that I do not think of women in that context as to their physical attributes and sexuality only. I do not fantasize about having a philosophical discussion with a brainy woman and being so turned on by it that I just have to seize her by the throat and start strangling her to death. (If that is the fantasy of someone here, I apologize for my insensitivlty in advance.)

Does that make any sense, or am I still being an offensive pig?

Blue

P.S. The opinions expressed in this thread are NOT the opinions of this board, but only of that sexist pig named Blue!

Like JohnM, I would perfer to focus on the positive things I seen in women and not grade them or comment on the negatives.

Ahh, I get it. I'd like to think I would be one of those to tell people to lighen up on sensibilities and political correctness for the sake of humor.

Some topics, however--I run for the hills. :-)

It might be the business I am in. I had a multi-girl shoot yesterday and one of the models goes, "I should be on bottom--I am heavier". I say, "yes you are" (in harmless agreement that she should be at the bottom). FOOT IN MOUTH. DOH!!!

JohnM

Blue

Women classify men by looks

We do? I would say speak for yourself but that is not applicable. I am only interested in a guy's mind, not his looks or his tackle! LOL

I do not fantasize about having a philosophical discussion with a brainy woman and being so turned on by it that I just have to seize her by the throat and start strangling her to death

You don't? Another of my long cherished beliefs wiped out. I'm going to have a lobotomy and drop my IQ by 100 now I know I have to be dumb.

Beauty and attraction cannot be quantified in a one-dimensional ratings scale.

Max5s wrote:I think that this is one of those special cases where, publicly, "grading" is also potentially "degrading" .

Possibly. Now, before I go on vacation and leave this topic to the rest of you, I'd like to stress that I'm talking about fantasy, NOT reality. For example, I didn't meet my wife, fall in love and marry her because of her looks alone. Of course not! She's very intelligent, and her heart is as big as a small Central American country. When I fantasize, however, I wonder what it'd be like to make love to Barbara Eden in that 'I Dream of Jeannie' costume. Definitely not reality.

So, no, Lady Ash, keep your IQ intact. It can be very erotic when you use that mind of yours as well as your whip as headmistress of the Bluestone Academy.

Women don't fantasize about handsome men? I believe you're pulling my leg... or something else down there. If women don't fantasize about handsome men, and men don't fantasize about beautiful women. If we're not really very shallow in our fantasy lives when political correctness is not a factor, then why are all Hollywood leading men and women gorgeous? Am I the only one here who tells it like it is? Has this political correctness crap even invaded our dreams and our fantasies? Whew! I guess I do need a vacation stat!!!

Well, I'm off to the beach to ogle bikini clad women for their minds! Cheers!

Bad Boy Blue

pssst...Ash.....one cannot, to my knowledge, have a negative IQ number; ergo, I suggest you not drop yours by 100 points! Besides, I want no competition down here.

I take no offense at all about Blue's poll, and find the responses 'interesting'.....LOL!...that NO one would respond

But about Men, there are only two categories required, Blue, for Women are not sexist nor vengeful creatures at all, nor shallow in any ways......well, 3 categories:

Pig
Dog
The Impossible Dream

Fortunately, two other things are true:

My tongue is firmly in my cheek (take that thought anywhere you wish)
and

Every Man here fits into the Impossible Dream category, of course!




Never thought of rating Men, never. So Category Names mean nothing to me nor would they if they were for a Judge Men contest or poll.

Besides, Blue....with many women, it's not 'the bod' that attracts, though honest eyes make a rapid connection, but what the overall effect and demeanor show about The Man inside.

But of course Women judge on those Higher Levels, you knew that, I'm sure. Never shallow, not Women.


Sandi

Sandi, you can't have a negative IQ? I never knew that. Are you sure?

Blue, yes I was jerking your tackle, I always fantasize about hunks but that is because it is fantasy. In real life, the first thing that attracts me to a man is his eyes. Partly if he looks me in the eyes, then I know he is interested in more than my looks. If he stares at my chest he is a no starter. If he cannot hold my eyes he is not going anywhere because holding my eyes shows his interest as me in a person. And eyes are windows into the soul, you can talk a good talk but you cannot hide the person shown by your eyes.

I certainly have a loose kind of rating system for ladies looks, even if I try not to focus over much on it... still, it's something I'd have trouble articulating or laying out in any scientific format.

Tattoos and piercings are getting bagged on again though! They tend to raise a girl a category or so for me - unless it's just one butterfly on an ankle or some equally milquetoast form of expression. Interesting and beautiful will always trump just beautiful - and I find tattoos interesting. As far as beauty, I don't think they add or subtract - they just intrigue. Piercings, on the other hand, are often beautiful to me... they add a bit of flourish where otherwise there wouldn't be any. Cindy Crawford achieved the same effect with a mole, but a mole is significantly less attractive than silver or gold to me.

-D

what is IQ? Is a intellectual level? When i trying to know how big is my IQ in english test i received that my IQ is 34... Is high level or not? Who is Mancy? people with high IQ level.. and from.. to it is?

Abaut woman. Im not belive that we can choic by how looks woman only... every kaind of woman consist different spiritual energy.. blone Petra- one energy, brunette Morrigan -more agressive energy.. when man choice a woman they choic not body, but energy of soul, psychical energy of spiritual person...

Any woman with attitude is a 10 in my book.